(This is based on testing with an image that had lots of high frequency detail and out of focus areas, which are very prone to the X-Trans "worminess".) I've confirmed for myself that with X-T2 files, at all ISOs between 20, I get the best results as follows. In my experience, Beta 2.0 of IXT does most of the RAW development better than Lightroom, but not all. I think the hardest part is figuring out which settings work best with your favourite image processing software. The workflow really is pretty straightforward. I liked On1 too at first glance but if those test shots are any measure the blacks are very weak If you're on Windows I would just get the free beta IXT and try it out as it looks to be the optimal option for high detail XTrans photography. I was just playing with it and mine appear to be normal TIFF's.
#Iridient developer for windows full version#
I don't think the macOS full version supports RAW->DNG transformations. On1 shows very good output for x-trans, it looks simple to use, plus it isn't that expensive. My work flow isn't huge to buy LR license, plus I don't like that massive catalog. I would really like to have full version of Iridient, but no Windows version yet, and it may never happen. I think I might check it out as well those results are looking really good Thanks for the review, I think, I'm falling in love with On1. I'm thinking that Fujifilm should consider buying Iridient/Brian. Iridient Developer in now available for Windows !!!.
0 kommentar(er)
